Monday, June 22, 2009
Statement from PCDC
The Pike County Democratic Committee has issued the following statement:
“Yolanda Goldsack’s decision to resign as Director of Elections is an act of service to Pike County’s voters,” said Julius Litman, Chairperson of the Pike County Democratic Committee (PCDC). Litman went on to say that during the more than two years that Mrs. Goldsack has held this position, Pike County Democrats have warned repeatedly against the corrupting conflict of interest represented by her presence as Director of Elections, even as these protestations fell on the deaf ears of the County’s Board of Commissioners. According to Elizabeth Forrest, the county’s State Committeewoman to the Pennsylvania Democratic Committee, ”Recent events have not only demonstrated the accuracy of our predictions of trouble during the 2009 election cycle, but have caused many in Republican and Independent ranks to echo our concerns.”
The PCDC wishes Mrs. Goldsack well and hopes that the transfer she seeks to another County position will be a better fit for her and for taxpayers. In order to regain the trust of Pike County’s voters, the PCDC is confident that the Board of Commissioners will publicly advertise for and actively seek a variety of qualified candidates in order to avoid any further suspicion of cronyism or patronage in a job that must be wholly non-partisan, both in practice and appearance. It is the PCDC’s fervent hope that the position of Director of Elections will be filled only after careful consideration and evaluation of candidates based on merit, proven experience, and tested professionalism. Forrest said, “The complexities of election law make it imperative that we find a candidate, regardless of party, who can execute its requirements with confidence and accuracy.” Both Litman and Forrest stated that the PCDC stands ready to cooperate with the new Director of Elections whoever he or she may be.
###
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
On Our Radar: PCPL Tax Referendum
The library will be taking this route, and our committee looks forward to meeting with library representatives in the near future to discuss the issue. What do you think? Is this something the Future of Pike County PAC should support?
Delaware Township Embraces Sunshine Law
Friday, June 5, 2009
The Tie is Broken!
For the play by play, see Ryan Baton's blog, RBforDV.
There will be 5 candidates vying for 4 seats in November. Pam Lutfy, Sue Schor, Jack Fisher, Bill Greenlaw and Bob Goldsack will be on the ballot November 3, 2009.
Chuck Pike will be the only candidate on the ballot for the 2-yr slot.
An update was published in the on-line edition of the Pike County Courier, and the Pike County Dispatch.
This November...
Wednesday, June 3, 2009
Do we encourage effective teachers?
From the press release:
Though a teacher’s effectiveness is singularly important to student success, schools do not distinguish great teaching from good, good from fair, or fair from poor, and a teacher’s effectiveness in helping students to succeed academically almost never factors into critical decisions such as how teachers are hired, developed or retained.This pervasive indifference to teacher performance is fundamentally disrespectful to teachers and gambles with the lives of students. It means that excellent teaching goes unrecognized, hard-working teachers who could improve are ignored, and poor performance goes unaddressed.
The study illustrates that teacher evaluation systems reflect and codify the “Widget Effect”—the tendency of school districts to treat teachers as essentially interchangeable—in several major ways:
- All teachers are rated “good” or “great.” Less than 1 percent of teachers receive unsatisfactory ratings, even in schools where students fail to meet basic academic standards, year after year.
- Excellence goes unrecognized. In districts with more than two ratings, 94 percent of teachers receive one of the top two. When superlative ratings are the norm, truly exceptional teachers cannot be formally identified. Nor can they be compensated, promoted or retained on a systemic basis.
- Professional development is inadequate. Almost 3 in 4 teachers did not receive any specific feedback on improving their performance in their last evaluation.
- Novice teachers are neglected. Low expectations for beginning teachers translate into benign neglect in the classroom and a toothless tenure process.
- Poor performance goes unaddressed. Half of the districts studied have not dismissed a single tenured teacher for poor performance in the past five years. None dismiss more than a few each year.
Please visit the site and read more about the study. I think there is much here that can generate good discussions about how to encourage more effective teachers. Teachers, students, and the community will all benefit from efforts to encourage effective teachers.
I would love to hear your thoughts on this!
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
May Campaign Finance Reports
- News Article - "After Dispute, Pike Man Allowed to Keep Campaign Documents"
- Editorial - "Obey the Law, Don't Make It"
Common Core State Standards Initiative
- According to a press release by The Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO):
- Purpose of the Initiative:
- Committee composition and timing:
- We will watch this effort and see what this will mean to the patchwork quilt of state tests under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), and for DVSD, the PSSA. United States Secretary of Education Arne Duncan indicates that he belives that the state initiated standardized tests are not always adequate, and that the Initiative has his support:
Monday, June 1, 2009
Secretary of Education Speaks at the National Press Club
Secretary Arne Duncan discussed President Obama’s education agenda in a speech at the National Press Club on May 29, 2009.
A video of the speech is at the National Press Club’s website. Here are text excerpts from the speech.
I found the following excerpts particually interesting:
- You should not be comforted by meeting state standards under NCLB:
- A call for transparency, access to information, and data analysis, some of my passions:
"We have to be transparent about our data. We have to raise the bar so that every child knows on every step of their educational trajectory what they’re going to do."
- Assessing and correcting deficiencies. This is fundamental to improvement:
"You should know in fifth and sixth and seventh and eighth grade what your strengths are, what you weaknesses are. And we should be working with teachers and parents, and students should be taking responsibility for their own education to really improve where they have deficiencies, where they have weaknesses."
- How Chicago was able to turn around some of their under-performing schools:
"We kept the children and brought in new teams of adults – same children, same families, same socioeconomic challenges, same neighborhoods, same buildings, different set of expectations, different set of beliefs. And what we saw was dramatic changes."